Pop-Rock Worship: Making the gospel both familiar and strange
Four Bearded Guys: the Texan, the Crowder, the Stranger, the Man. |
(This is part two of a three-part blog entry on a consultation that took place at Calvin College, May 19-21, 2014. See part one here; part three here. The following is one half of a brief reflection I offered to the group on the last morning of our gathering. These thoughts are in rough draft form and were scribbled out just before our session. At some point in the future I'll want to make more of them, but here they are, as is, for now. And, yes, it was a very bearded affair.)
The first thing I wish to say
is that each of you is doing good work for which you should be commended and
honored. Thank you for persevering in the face of difficult circumstances.
Thank you for not giving up, on us, the church, or on the task at hand. Thank
you for your faithful labors which perhaps have not always borne
visible or quantifiable fruit. Thank you for being willing to try something
new and for trusting God at times when that has felt nearly impossible.
As I think of a way to
distill the conversations of the past couple of days, a phrase from former
Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, comes to mind. In a small but
densely rich book on the work of reading church history, titled, Why Study the
Past?: The Quest for the Historical Church,
Williams proposes that the task of a good historian is to discover
history, for the reader, as both familiar and strange.
A good historian by this measure
avoids seeing history as utterly strange (and therefore having nothing to do
with our contemporary selves) or as utterly familiar (and therefore turned into
an mere image of ourselves). Conversely, a poor reading of history fails to see
our points of continuity and discontinuity with the past—how very much we are
formed and influenced by our forebears and how we have, in fact, ventured into
new places and experiences.
Towards the middle of the
book Williams observes that public worship is an important
context for making our life as the Body of Christ both strange and familiar.
Applied to our discussions this week, I would like to suggest the following.
While in the Psalter, as Israel’s
hymnal, we encounter the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob made both familiar and
strange to us, it is in the gospel accounts that we encounter the God of Jesus
Christ made even more familiar, even more strange than we ever dared to imagine.
Here we encounter an intimate and familial knowledge of God: God as Father,
Jesus as our Brother, the Holy Spirit as the abiding Presence.
Here we encounter also the
strangeness of God all over again. To paraphrase Bonhoeffer, from a sermon which he
preached on the Trinity, on May 27, 1934:
“The more we come to know this God, the more mysterious he becomes for
us. It is not the God who is furthest away from us who is the biggest mystery,
but rather the God who is nearest us in the Spirit of Jesus Christ."
This is equally true, of course, of ourselves: the more we know this
God and are known by this God, the more we come to know our true selves as far more
familiar and far more strange than we ever thought possible.
To apply this idea to the topic of our consultation: In what ways does pop-rock worship enable
the gospel to become both familiar and strange to us? In what way does this
particular form of worship, with all its common characteristics and different
permutations, enable the church to encounter the familiarity and strangeness of
our triune God?
1.
CREATION: if
God has vested creation with a near infinite possibility of sounds and
combinations of sounds, and provided these as an expression of his love for
creation and for the human creature, then in what ways does pop-rock worship
music represent a gift to the church?
In what ways
might worship leaders give voice to creation’s praise and let these
distinctive pop-rock sounds in creation become caught up in the praise of God’s
people, and vice versa perhaps?
More
specifically: What musical capacities
does pop-rock open up for the church’s worship and what does it close down?
What biblical narratives does it enable the church’s worship to accent? What theological realities might it focus for us? What liturgical activities could it facilitate? What relational dynamics does it forge and what missional inertias will it more likely generate than others?
What biblical narratives does it enable the church’s worship to accent? What theological realities might it focus for us? What liturgical activities could it facilitate? What relational dynamics does it forge and what missional inertias will it more likely generate than others?
Matt Boswell, Miranda Dodson and myself. |
Myself, Andy Piercy, Latifah Phillips, Graham Kendrick. |
Comments